NATAegisFlow Artifact Workflow Checklist Template¶
Version: 1.2
Purpose: This checklist helps teams validate NATAegisFlow-related artifacts before acceptance, release, adoption review, or governance review.
When to Use: Use for user stories, patches, or controlled artifact changes that rely on NATAegisFlow semantic validation evidence.
This checklist is a specialized application of the six BGSTM phases. It does not define an additional BGSTM phase.
Artifact and Story Details¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Artifact ID / Name | [Artifact identifier and name] |
| Related Story / Requirement | [Story, requirement, or change ID] |
| Artifact Type | [ETL mapping, rule set, validation output, patch, report, other] |
| NATAegisFlow Run ID | [Run identifier or link] |
| Owner | [Artifact owner] |
| Reviewer | [Semantic reviewer] |
| Approver | [Policy gate approver] |
| Target Release / Sprint | [Release, sprint, or gate] |
| Run Mode | [Production/Controlled rollout/Retrospective follow-up] |
Acceptance Criteria¶
- Artifact scope, source inputs, target outputs, and affected consumers are identified
- Semantic validation checkpoints are defined for glossary terms, lineage, transformation intent, and rule outcomes
- NATAegisFlow findings are reviewed and assigned a disposition: resolved, accepted, deferred, or false positive
- Critical and high semantic findings are resolved or have documented risk acceptance
- Patch validation is complete for all changed mappings, rules, evidence files, and downstream references
- Required evidence is attached and accessible from the story or artifact record
- Rollout readiness and process owner sign-off are recorded for adoption or governance review
Pre-Flight Evidence Inventory¶
- NATAegisFlow run configuration, rule set version, and input artifact versions are recorded
- Lineage export, mapping specification, data contract, and sample replay evidence are available before triage
- Evidence location, access permissions, and retention expectations are confirmed
- Reviewer, owner, and approver availability is confirmed for the policy gate window
Semantic Validation Checkpoints¶
| Checkpoint | Expected Evidence | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business meaning preserved | NATAegisFlow semantic comparison, reviewer notes | [Pass/Fail/Blocked] | [Notes] |
| Lineage and source-to-target mapping verified | Lineage export, mapping spec, data contract reference | [Pass/Fail/Blocked] | [Notes] |
| Transformation rules match approved intent | Rule evaluation output, sample validation, business approval | [Pass/Fail/Blocked] | [Notes] |
| Findings dispositioned | Findings register with owner, severity, disposition, and rationale | [Pass/Fail/Blocked] | [Notes] |
| Residual risk assessed | Risk register entry or approval comment | [Pass/Fail/Blocked] | [Notes] |
Policy Gate and Approval Workflow¶
- Policy gate criteria are documented for this artifact
- Required reviewers have completed semantic validation review
- Required approver has approved release, conditional release, or rework
- Exceptions include approver, rationale, compensating controls, and follow-up date
- Approval record links to NATAegisFlow run ID, artifact version, and evidence location
- Medium-or-higher open findings have owner, disposition, target date, and gate impact recorded
| Gate | Required Role | Decision | Date | Evidence / Approval Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semantic Review | [Reviewer] | [Approved/Changes Required] | [Date] | [Link] |
| Policy Gate | [Approver] | [Approved/Conditional/Rejected] | [Date] | [Link] |
| Release / Handoff | [Owner] | [Complete/Blocked] | [Date] | [Link] |
Adoption Retrospective and Process Owner Sign-off¶
- Friction points and improvement ideas are captured for adoption feedback or retrospective review
- Concrete process changes are identified or explicitly marked as not found
- Template or process documentation updates are linked to the evidence package
- Readiness decision is recorded: [Ready for production use / Controlled rollout / Not ready]
- Process owner sign-off confirms the checklist is complete, versioned, and approved for the intended use
- Follow-up owner and review date are assigned for each accepted process change
Evidence Package¶
- Evidence attached
- NATAegisFlow output files or report links attached
- Artifact version, patch ID, and source data versions recorded
- Reviewer notes and finding dispositions attached
- Approval record attached
- Evidence location meets access control and retention expectations
- Adoption retrospective or lessons-learned record attached when applicable
Patch Validation¶
- Patch validation complete
- Changed artifacts are compared against the approved baseline
- Regression or replay validation confirms no unintended semantic drift
- Downstream consumers, reports, or operational handoffs are updated if affected
- Follow-up backlog items are created for accepted or deferred findings
Related Documentation¶
- ETL Semantic Validation Applied Example
- BGSTM Testing Phases
- Test Case Template
- Traceability Matrix Template
- NATAegisFlow Artifact Workflow Example
- AegisFlow BGSTM Adoption Retrospective and Sign-off
- Agile Testing Checklist
- Scrum Sprint Testing Checklist
End of NATAegisFlow Artifact Workflow Checklist Template